darcs

Issue 1635 WebDAV support

Title WebDAV support
Priority wishlist Status wont-fix
Milestone Resolved in
Superseder Nosy List darcs-devel, dmitry.kurochkin, kowey
Assigned To
Topics

Created on 2009-10-02.13:42:17 by kowey, last changed 2009-10-02.13:42:17 by kowey.

Messages
msg8903 (view) Author: kowey Date: 2009-10-02.13:42:14
I'm transferring this from the wiki.  Looks like a wont-fix from the discussion,
but a discussion which risks to come up a again, so I'm tracking it here.

-----------
Do WebDAV / DeltaV. Those are the two IETF standards that will give you the most
uptake.

---

''Uptake of what? What exactly do you want to happen with WebDav and Delta V? If
you want get this item of the wishlist, you might at least bring it up on the
users lists. It's not clear what you are wishing for. --MarkStosberg''

''The Subversion people have tried exporting their repositories using WebDAV
(WebDA + DeltaV). They found out that the WebDAV model is sufficiently different
from their model that they needed to include a number of proprietary extensions
to the protocol -- hence losing most of the benefits of using a well-established
protocol. The situation would be even more difficult with Darcs, which is
patch-based rather than file-based, and hence completely different from WebDAV.

---

An alternative would be to use WebDA (without the V) as a file transfer protocol
in addition to HTTP and ssh. That's what Arch does, but that would be overkill
for Darcs, which has simpler on-disk structures, and could get away just with
using HTTP's PUT if the remote server supports If-Match properly (WebDA is a
monster of complexity). -- JuliuszChroboczek''
History
Date User Action Args
2009-10-02 13:42:17koweycreate