Issue 1729: why does darcs write all inventories? - Darcs bug tracker

Title	why does darcs write all inventories?
Priority	bug	Status	duplicate
Milestone		Resolved in
Superseder	make darcs record, etc. O(1) in time (is now O(n) wrt num patches) View: 1106	Nosy List	darcs-devel, dmitry.kurochkin, kowey, simonmar
Assigned To		Topics	Hashed, Performance

Created on 2010-01-09.18:38:49 by kowey, last changed 2010-01-14.09:58:34 by kowey.

Messages
msg9763 (view)	Author: kowey	Date: 2010-01-09.18:38:43
Looks like we need a volunteer to investigate this. Could it just be overzealous reporting? Like maybe that's just chock-full of no-ops? Quoting Simon Marlow from http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/2009-December/022689.html For example, I just pushed a few patches from one GHC repo to another and it went like this: Shall I push this patch? (7/7) [ynWvplxdaqjk], or ? for help: y Writing inventory 3 done, 30 queued. 0000330575-fa3eaa4bf6ddc10a086115a0b3ad2aa2 Writing inventory 4 done, 29 queued. 0001980260-fa47963e3f314d52c3e1aa9136e00cd0 Writing inventory 33 done, 0 queued. 0000218257-06c742c93d020a1c3bbac14af46a1c8e Finished applying... Push successful.
msg9819 (view)	Author: kowey	Date: 2010-01-14.09:58:31
Skimming Petr's analysis in http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/2010-January/022785.html I think this is a duplicate of issue1106

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-01-09 18:38:49	kowey	create
2010-01-14 09:58:34	kowey	set	status: needs-reproduction -> duplicate messages: + msg9819 superseder: + make darcs record, etc. O(1) in time (is now O(n) wrt num patches)