darcs

Issue 1820 reconcile_unwindings failure

Title reconcile_unwindings failure
Priority bug Status duplicate
Milestone Resolved in
Superseder pull => bug in function reconcile_unwindings (** minimal test case **)
View: 194
Nosy List darcs-devel, dmitry.kurochkin, fx, kowey
Assigned To
Topics Conflicts

Created on 2010-04-18.11:30:34 by fx, last changed 2010-04-26.21:27:54 by fx.

Files
File name Uploaded Type Edit Remove
typescript fx, 2010-04-18.11:30:30 text/plain
unnamed fx, 2010-04-18.11:30:30 text/plain
Messages
msg10752 (view) Author: fx Date: 2010-04-18.11:30:32
I got `bug at src/Darcs/Patch/Commute.lhs:602 ... in function
reconcile_unwindings' while doing a pull.  There are similar reports in
the tracker, but with older versions.  Let me know if you think this is
a new case and you want a copy of the repo and patch.  Typescript and
version info attached.
Attachments
msg10823 (view) Author: kowey Date: 2010-04-26.16:43:39
Thanks!  I'm going to assume this is another instance of issue194 which
Darcs2 format repositories fix.  A particular interesting point about
issue194 is that it contains a minimal test case, so maybe you could
double-check to see if the stuff in the darcssum repo resembles this case.

I actually *do* appreciate this when-in-doubt-create-a-new-ticket
attitude which is to add to comment on an open ticket if it's clear
you've got the same bug, but file a new ticket if you have any
uncertainty about it.  But maybe that's because the tracker is still
small :-)
msg10841 (view) Author: fx Date: 2010-04-26.21:27:53
Eric Kow <bugs@darcs.net> writes:

> Thanks!  I'm going to assume this is another instance of issue194 which
> Darcs2 format repositories fix.

Sorry, I didn't see that it's fixed by the version 2 repos.  Is there a
list of such known issues distilled somewhere?  If not it might be worth
making one at least incrementally from cases like this as they come in.

> A particular interesting point about
> issue194 is that it contains a minimal test case, so maybe you could
> double-check to see if the stuff in the darcssum repo resembles this case.

I wouldn't have thought so in terms of the steps in that case.

Going through it does raise another merge issue, though, which I'll
pursue later...
History
Date User Action Args
2010-04-18 11:30:34fxcreate
2010-04-26 16:43:40koweysetstatus: unknown -> duplicate
topic: + Conflicts
nosy: + kowey
messages: + msg10823
priority: bug
superseder: + pull => bug in function reconcile_unwindings (** minimal test case **)
2010-04-26 21:27:54fxsetmessages: + msg10841