Eric Kow <bugs@darcs.net> writes:
> Thanks! I'm going to assume this is another instance of issue194 which
> Darcs2 format repositories fix.
Sorry, I didn't see that it's fixed by the version 2 repos. Is there a
list of such known issues distilled somewhere? If not it might be worth
making one at least incrementally from cases like this as they come in.
> A particular interesting point about
> issue194 is that it contains a minimal test case, so maybe you could
> double-check to see if the stuff in the darcssum repo resembles this case.
I wouldn't have thought so in terms of the steps in that case.
Going through it does raise another merge issue, though, which I'll
pursue later...
|