Created on 2007-10-28.23:51:12 by devurandom, last changed 2009-08-27.13:57:10 by admin.
msg2182 (view) |
Author: devurandom |
Date: 2007-10-28.23:51:11 |
|
I would like to push changes via sftp to a location which has no darcs
installed. URL could look like sftp://username@host/path/to/repos.
|
msg3068 (view) |
Author: markstos |
Date: 2008-02-03.02:32:32 |
|
> I would like to push changes via sftp to a location which has no darcs
> installed. URL could look like sftp://username@host/path/to/repos.
If you are just making a repository mirror, you can use a program like "unison"
or "rsync" as efficient alternatives to darcs.
If you require anything more out of this remote repo, I think it's fair for a
darcs to installed there, or that you work out the merges in a local repo in and
then use rsync or unison to mirror *that*.
I nominate that this wish be resolved as "wont-fix".
|
msg3077 (view) |
Author: kowey |
Date: 2008-02-03.08:41:05 |
|
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 02:32:33 -0000, Mark Stosberg wrote:
> If you are just making a repository mirror, you can use a program like "unison"
> or "rsync" as efficient alternatives to darcs.
I have also put up a small word on the wiki pointing out that using
unison is now much safer than it used to be, thanks to darcs2's hashed
pristined. Yay, David!
|
msg3079 (view) |
Author: devurandom |
Date: 2008-02-03.10:00:25 |
|
So I will have to go with something like sshfs?
|
msg3099 (view) |
Author: droundy |
Date: 2008-02-04.15:36:21 |
|
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 10:00:26AM -0000, devurandom wrote:
> So I will have to go with something like sshfs?
You could try that, but sshfs is a pretty cruddy piece of work, and may not
work very well. It doesn't implement POSIX filesystem semantics.
David
|
msg3103 (view) |
Author: markstos |
Date: 2008-02-04.15:55:00 |
|
David Roundy wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 10:00:26AM -0000, devurandom wrote:
>> So I will have to go with something like sshfs?
>
> You could try that, but sshfs is a pretty cruddy piece of work, and may not
> work very well. It doesn't implement POSIX filesystem semantics.
sshfs had worked generally well for me in the past, until I realized
that tools like "updatedb" were treating it like a local file system,
and generating problematic amounts of load and logging. Perhaps that's a
separately solvable problem, but my workaround has been to use it less,
or not at all.
Mark
|
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2007-10-28 23:51:14 | devurandom | create | |
2008-02-03 02:32:33 | markstos | set | status: unread -> deferred nosy:
+ markstos messages:
+ msg3068 title: Pushing via sftp to a location which has no darcs installed. -> wish: Pushing via sftp to a location which has no darcs installed. |
2008-02-03 08:41:07 | kowey | set | nosy:
droundy, tommy, beschmi, kowey, markstos, devurandom messages:
+ msg3077 |
2008-02-03 10:00:26 | devurandom | set | nosy:
droundy, tommy, beschmi, kowey, markstos, devurandom messages:
+ msg3079 |
2008-02-04 15:36:23 | droundy | set | nosy:
droundy, tommy, beschmi, kowey, markstos, devurandom messages:
+ msg3099 |
2008-02-04 15:55:02 | markstos | set | nosy:
droundy, tommy, beschmi, kowey, markstos, devurandom messages:
+ msg3103 |
2008-03-28 18:47:00 | droundy | set | status: deferred -> wont-fix nosy:
droundy, tommy, beschmi, kowey, markstos, devurandom |
2009-08-06 17:41:00 | admin | set | nosy:
+ jast, Serware, dmitry.kurochkin, darcs-devel, zooko, dagit, mornfall, simon, thorkilnaur, - droundy, devurandom |
2009-08-06 20:38:14 | admin | set | nosy:
- beschmi |
2009-08-10 22:09:19 | admin | set | nosy:
+ devurandom, - darcs-devel, zooko, jast, dagit, Serware, mornfall |
2009-08-25 17:54:34 | admin | set | nosy:
+ darcs-devel, - simon |
2009-08-27 13:57:10 | admin | set | nosy:
tommy, kowey, markstos, darcs-devel, thorkilnaur, devurandom, dmitry.kurochkin |
|