Created on 2008-03-22.02:52:46 by vmiklos, last changed 2009-08-27.13:57:00 by admin.
| msg3956 (view) |
Author: vmiklos |
Date: 2008-03-22.02:52:45 |
|
how to reproduce:
$ darcs get http://ftp.frugalware.org/pub/archive/other/darcs/frugalware-current/
$ darcs get --to-match "hash 20050127214749-3bee8-696de7886abbb1b27960790a414aaeb138f7206b.gz" frugalware-current tmp
darcs: failed to read patch in get_extra:
Sun Jan 14 04:08:03 UTC 2007 crazy <crazy@frugalware.org>
* ndiswrapper-1.34-1-i686
* Version bump
Perhaps this is a 'partial' repository?
'ndiswrapper-1.34-1-i686' is
20070114040803-f6986-0b0716f3dbe5ab62512842837a38a2bb741927d5.gz, you
can check it yourself.
$ ls frugalware-current/_darcs/patches/20070114040803-f6986-0b0716f3dbe5ab62512842837a38a2bb741927d5.gz
frugalware-current/_darcs/patches/20070114040803-f6986-0b0716f3dbe5ab62512842837a38a2bb741927d5.gz
so it seem to be there.
thanks
|
| msg3958 (view) |
Author: tux_rocker |
Date: 2008-03-22.10:24:48 |
|
Duplicate of 755
|
| msg3960 (view) |
Author: vmiklos |
Date: 2008-03-22.12:00:11 |
|
yes. quite strange, as i'm sure i sent only _one_ mail to bugs@darcs.net :S
please close this bug.
thanks
|
| msg3965 (view) |
Author: droundy |
Date: 2008-03-22.16:50:02 |
|
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 02:52:46AM -0000, VMiklos wrote:
> how to reproduce:
>
> $ darcs get http://ftp.frugalware.org/pub/archive/other/darcs/frugalware-current/
> $ darcs get --to-match "hash 20050127214749-3bee8-696de7886abbb1b27960790a414aaeb138f7206b.gz" frugalware-current tmp
> darcs: failed to read patch in get_extra:
> Sun Jan 14 04:08:03 UTC 2007 crazy <crazy@frugalware.org>
> * ndiswrapper-1.34-1-i686
> * Version bump
> Perhaps this is a 'partial' repository?
I wonder if this might be a running-out-of-memory bug? This succeeds on my
computer (although it's pretty slow). Any chance you could keep an eye on
top while running this? Is your computer running 32 bit darcs or 64 bit
darcs?
David
P.S. Thanks for the bug report!
|
| msg3966 (view) |
Author: vmiklos |
Date: 2008-03-22.17:00:19 |
|
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 04:50:05PM -0000, David Roundy <bugs@darcs.net> wrote:
> I wonder if this might be a running-out-of-memory bug? This succeeds on my
> computer (although it's pretty slow). Any chance you could keep an eye on
> top while running this? Is your computer running 32 bit darcs or 64 bit
> darcs?
18714 vmiklos 20 0 30488 24m 2864 R 82.6 2.4 0:20.65 darcs
so it does not eat more than 24mb of memory, shile eating 82% of the cpu
(pretty normal).
this is a 32 bit darcs. did you try on a 64bit machine?
|
| msg3969 (view) |
Author: droundy |
Date: 2008-03-22.17:24:43 |
|
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 05:00:20PM -0000, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 04:50:05PM -0000, David Roundy <bugs@darcs.net> wrote:
> > I wonder if this might be a running-out-of-memory bug? This succeeds on my
> > computer (although it's pretty slow). Any chance you could keep an eye on
> > top while running this? Is your computer running 32 bit darcs or 64 bit
> > darcs?
>
> 18714 vmiklos 20 0 30488 24m 2864 R 82.6 2.4 0:20.65 darcs
>
> so it does not eat more than 24mb of memory, shile eating 82% of the cpu
> (pretty normal).
>
> this is a 32 bit darcs. did you try on a 64bit machine?
Yeah, and right now it's using 2.5 gig of memory, so I think it's say to
say that this is a memory-consumption bug.
--
David Roundy
Department of Physics
Oregon State University
|
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2008-03-22 02:52:46 | vmiklos | create | |
| 2008-03-22 10:24:49 | tux_rocker | set | priority: bug
nosy:
+ tux_rocker
status: unread -> unknown
messages:
+ msg3958 |
| 2008-03-22 10:25:08 | tux_rocker | set | status: unknown -> duplicate
nosy:
tommy, beschmi, kowey, vmiklos, tux_rocker |
| 2008-03-22 12:00:12 | vmiklos | set | nosy:
tommy, beschmi, kowey, vmiklos, tux_rocker
messages:
+ msg3960 |
| 2008-03-22 16:50:04 | droundy | set | nosy:
+ droundy
messages:
+ msg3965 |
| 2008-03-22 17:00:20 | vmiklos | set | nosy:
droundy, tommy, beschmi, kowey, vmiklos, tux_rocker
messages:
+ msg3966 |
| 2008-03-22 17:24:44 | droundy | set | nosy:
droundy, tommy, beschmi, kowey, vmiklos, tux_rocker
messages:
+ msg3969
title: darcs get --to-match "hash foo" broken for large repos -> darcs get --to-match "hash foo" uses excessive memory for large repos |
| 2009-08-06 17:57:10 | admin | set | nosy:
+ markstos, jast, Serware, dmitry.kurochkin, darcs-devel, zooko, dagit, mornfall, simon, thorkilnaur, - droundy, vmiklos, tux_rocker |
| 2009-08-06 21:00:52 | admin | set | nosy:
- beschmi |
| 2009-08-10 22:18:32 | admin | set | nosy:
+ vmiklos, tux_rocker, - markstos, darcs-devel, zooko, jast, dagit, Serware, mornfall |
| 2009-08-25 18:07:55 | admin | set | nosy:
+ darcs-devel, - simon |
| 2009-08-27 13:57:00 | admin | set | nosy:
tommy, kowey, vmiklos, darcs-devel, thorkilnaur, tux_rocker, dmitry.kurochkin |
|
