|
|
Created on 2008-07-02.16:23:51 by wlux, last changed 2008-08-14.15:30:56 by simon.
|
| File name |
Uploaded |
Type |
Edit |
Remove |
|
bug.sh
|
wlux,
2008-07-02.16:23:44
|
application/octet-stream |
|
|
|
| msg5500 (view) |
Author: kowey |
Date: 2008-08-14.06:43:04 |
|
I've submitted your test case to the repository. Sorry for the delay!
|
| msg5184 (view) |
Author: wlux |
Date: 2008-07-05.08:11:23 |
|
Eric Kow wrote:
> Eric Kow <eric.kow@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm sorry, but I just got confused by that response! You said that
> it was
> working fine with darcs 1.0.9 and now is no longer working with
> darcs 2, so that
> *is* a regression, right? Thanks!
Blush. Of course it is a regression.
Don't know how I managed to write anything different ...
|
| msg5183 (view) |
Author: kowey |
Date: 2008-07-04.09:19:20 |
|
Hi,
I'm sorry, but I just got confused by that response! You said that it was
working fine with darcs 1.0.9 and now is no longer working with darcs 2, so that
*is* a regression, right? Thanks!
|
| msg5182 (view) |
Author: wlux |
Date: 2008-07-04.09:16:32 |
|
Eric Kow wrote:
> Eric Kow <eric.kow@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> Assigning to myself to reproduce. Thanks for the test script!
>
> Please feel free to submit it as a patch (we have a bugs/ directory
> for
> currently known reproducible bugs).
>
> Also, is this a regression from darcs 1.0.9 to your knowledge?
Definitely not, the test script works fine with 1.0.9 and I never had
problems with partial repositories before darcs2
|
| msg5179 (view) |
Author: kowey |
Date: 2008-07-04.08:46:27 |
|
Assigning to myself to reproduce. Thanks for the test script!
Please feel free to submit it as a patch (we have a bugs/ directory for
currently known reproducible bugs).
Also, is this a regression from darcs 1.0.9 to your knowledge?
|
| msg5171 (view) |
Author: wlux |
Date: 2008-07-02.16:23:44 |
|
Hello,
I have encountered a bug where darcs 2.0.2 writes out an incorrect
inventory when undoing changes or performing darcs optimize in a
repository checked out with darcs get --partial. This seems to happen
only when multiple checkpoints are present. In particular, the
inventory written out after these operations lists *all* patches of
the repository rather than only the patches since the checkpoint.
This may lead to problems with future commands and darcs check.
The test script attached below reproduces the problem. In this case
it was necessary to introduce three check points, but I have observed
the issue in a real world repository with only two checkpoints, too.
Regards
Wolfgang
|
Browse related patches:
unstable
|
stable
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2008-08-14 15:30:56 | simon | set | nosy:
- simon |
| 2008-08-14 06:43:06 | kowey | set | nosy:
+ darcs-devel, simon, - serware
messages:
+ msg5500
assignedto: kowey -> |
| 2008-07-05 08:11:27 | wlux | set | nosy:
+ serware
messages:
+ msg5184 |
| 2008-07-04 09:19:29 | kowey | set | topic:
+ Regression
nosy:
+ serware, - serware
messages:
+ msg5183 |
| 2008-07-04 09:16:36 | wlux | set | nosy:
+ serware
messages:
+ msg5182 |
| 2008-07-04 08:46:34 | kowey | set | status: unread -> chatting
topic:
+ Darcs2, IncludesExampleOrTest
title: Bug: darcs can corrupt inventory of a partial repository -> darcs can corrupt inventory of a partial repository
nosy:
+ Serware, wlux, kowey, - wlux
messages:
+ msg5179
priority: bug
assignedto: kowey |
| 2008-07-04 08:45:03 | kowey | link | issue945 superseder |
| 2008-07-02 16:23:51 | wlux | create | |
|
