On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 02:43:09PM -0000, Adrian Irving-Beer wrote:
> Hi, found three bugs and thought I'd report them.

We appreciate the bug report, but would have appreciated it even more if
you had sent three separate bug reports, as that makes it easier for us to
deal with the issues separately.

> Bug #1:  "darcs whatsnew --look-for-adds" implies --summary.

This is a feature, not a bug.

> Bug #2:  Add a file, set as boringfile, "record --look-for-adds",
> 	 bogus remove in next whatsnew.

This sounds like an annoying sort of bug that has plagued us before, but
I'm surprised that the setpref boring is associated with it.

> Bug #3:  Repo A host X ==get==> repo B host X ==get==> repo C host Y,
> 	 repo C cannot see repo A's patches.

I'll reply to this separately (and maybe move it off into a separate bug
report).

> Here's #1 and #2, with commands spaced for readability:

Would you by any chance be willing to write this sequence (for #2) up as a
script? That would enable me to pretty easily add it to our test suite
(which is the best way to start fixing it).

David