Patch 1: test with hand-attached - Darcs bug tracker

Title	test with hand-attached
Superseder		Nosy List	kowey
Related Issues	add patch-tracking features to roundup, darcs conflict marking gives different results in different orders (OT TP2) View: 1571, 1609
Status	rejected	Assigned To
Milestone

Created on 2009-10-21.18:38:09 by kowey, last changed 2009-11-14.14:40:05 by kowey.

Files
File name	Status	Uploaded	Type	Edit	Remove
accept-issue1609_-operational-transformations-tp2-on-conflict-marking_.dpatch		kowey, 2009-10-22.08:01:18	text/x-darcs-patch
draft_-haddockize-literate-comments-in-darcs_patch_properties_.dpatch		kowey, 2009-10-31.18:08:45	text/x-darcs-patch

See mailing list archives for discussion on individual patches.

Messages
msg8986 (view)	Author: kowey	Date: 2009-10-21.19:08:51
testing our new patch user interface on roundup (don't take this too seriously yet)
msg8988 (view)	Author: dagit	Date: 2009-10-21.20:25:43
I'm confused by the way roundup displays the patch. Is failing-issue1609_ot_convergence.sh the patch? When I click on the file name my browser wants me to download the file. Ideally I could see the patch contents as text as a message.
msg8992 (view)	Author: kowey	Date: 2009-10-22.07:59:43
We're moving delicately on this. My intention is to preserve the email-based workflow and allow the patch-tracker to sit on top of it, just as a device for monitoring the review state. (Hence the deliberately small change note box)
msg8993 (view)	Author: kowey	Date: 2009-10-22.08:01:18
Brain fart. I had accidentally submitted the file and not the darcs patch. Attachments accept-issue1609_-operational-transformations-tp2-on-conflict-marking_.dpatch
msg9013 (view)	Author: kowey	Date: 2009-10-23.15:12:36
OK the way to use the patch-tracker (until we figure out a smarter way) is just to remove old versions of patches as we add new ones. Or maybe not. We can also just go by the upload date... since we're seeing it as a table, that's probably good enough.
msg9131 (view)	Author: kowey	Date: 2009-10-31.18:09:05
Trying to see if attaching a patch by hand (instead of via darcs send) causes roundup to still create a spurious 'unnamed' attachment. Attachments draft_-haddockize-literate-comments-in-darcs_patch_properties_.dpatch

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2009-10-21 18:38:09	kowey	create
2009-10-21 19:00:56	kowey	set	issues: + darcs conflict marking gives different results in different orders (OT TP2)
2009-10-21 19:08:51	kowey	set	status: needs-review messages: + msg8986
2009-10-21 20:25:44	dagit	set	messages: + msg8988
2009-10-22 07:59:44	kowey	set	messages: + msg8992
2009-10-22 08:01:18	kowey	set	files: + accept-issue1609_-operational-transformations-tp2-on-conflict-marking_.dpatch messages: + msg8993
2009-10-22 08:13:20	kowey	set	issues: + add patch-tracking features to roundup
2009-10-22 08:50:59	kowey	set	assignedto: kowey
2009-10-22 08:51:38	kowey	set	assignedto: kowey ->
2009-10-23 15:09:29	kowey	set	files: - failing-issue1609_ot_convergence.sh
2009-10-23 15:12:37	kowey	set	messages: + msg9013
2009-10-27 16:47:53	kowey	set	status: needs-review -> obsoleted
2009-10-28 09:48:45	admin	retired
2009-10-31 18:06:10	admin	restored
2009-10-31 18:09:06	kowey	set	files: + draft_-haddockize-literate-comments-in-darcs_patch_properties_.dpatch nosy: + kowey messages: + msg9131 title: test patch -> test with hand-attached
2009-11-14 14:39:52	kowey	set	status: obsoleted -> accepted-pending-tests
2009-11-14 14:40:05	kowey	set	status: accepted-pending-tests -> rejected