Creating patch to "http://darcs.net/darcs-bugtracker"...

Wed Dec  9 16:29:32 EST 2009  Trent W. Buck <trentbuck@gmail.com>
  * Use relative path for logfile.
  This shouldn't affect the production instance, but will make it easier
  for developers to run roundup-server on a local checkout (they likely
  lack write access to /var/lib/roundup/trackers/darcs/roundup.log).

Attachments

• unnamed
• use-relative-path-for-logfile_.dpatch

On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 05:34:54 +0000, Trent W. Buck wrote:
> Creating patch to "http://darcs.net/darcs-bugtracker"...

Is it a really good idea to cc patches for non darcs-specific stuff to
the tracker?

> Wed Dec  9 16:29:32 EST 2009  Trent W. Buck <trentbuck@gmail.com>
>   * Use relative path for logfile.
>   This shouldn't affect the production instance, but will make it easier
>   for developers to run roundup-server on a local checkout (they likely
>   lack write access to /var/lib/roundup/trackers/darcs/roundup.log).

Applied, thanks!  I don't think the darcswatch integration is designed for
this so I'll just update the tracker via the subject

-- 
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9

This patch bundle (with 1 patches) was just applied to the repository http://darcs.net/darcs-bugtracker.
This message was brought to you by DarcsWatch
http://darcswatch.nomeata.de/repo_http:__darcs.net_darcs-bugtracker.html#bundle-ebde2bff6dfc3aad3c7ed12e385c77cb0ab2764f

Eric Kow wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 05:34:54 +0000, Trent W. Buck wrote:
>> Creating patch to "http://darcs.net/darcs-bugtracker"...
>
> Is it a really good idea to cc patches for non darcs-specific stuff
> to the tracker?

I don't know.  It seemed like a good idea at the time.