Patch 2067: rename format new-style-rebase-in-progre... (and 1 more) - Darcs bug tracker

Title	rename format new-style-rebase-in-progre... (and 1 more)
Superseder		Nosy List	bfrk
Related Issues
Status	accepted	Assigned To
Milestone

Created on 2020-07-22.15:08:06 by bfrk, last changed 2020-07-25.22:13:07 by ganesh.

Files
File name	Status	Uploaded	Type	Edit	Remove
patch-preview.txt		bfrk, 2020-07-22.15:08:06	text/x-darcs-patch
rename-format-new_style_rebase_in_progress-to-rebase_in_progress_2_16.dpatch		bfrk, 2020-07-22.15:08:06	application/x-darcs-patch
unnamed		bfrk, 2020-07-22.15:08:06	text/plain

See mailing list archives for discussion on individual patches.

Messages
msg22247 (view)	Author: bfrk	Date: 2020-07-22.15:08:06
And yet another item from the 2.16 TODO list. 2 patches for repository http://darcs.net/screened: patch d93db849385b28de0040d8286955fc27d3597351 Author: Ben Franksen <ben.franksen@online.de> Date: Wed Jul 22 11:23:12 CEST 2020 * rename format new-style-rebase-in-progress to rebase-in-progress-2-16 The former is, however, temporarily kept as a (read-only) alias. patch e10416e08b8c719c9d3f0387b2c6a1438080361b Author: Ben Franksen <ben.franksen@online.de> Date: Wed Jul 22 11:27:12 CEST 2020 * minor fix in haddocs for createRepoFormat Attachments patch-preview.txt rename-format-new_style_rebase_in_progress-to-rebase_in_progress_2_16.dpatch unnamed
msg22252 (view)	Author: ganesh	Date: 2020-07-25.21:05:24
Looks fine. You are probably the only person who will actually need the alias so no particular need for the test. The patch has a slightly confusing mix of token replaces and actual line changes to do the rename, but it's not a big deal and no point in trying to change that now anyway.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2020-07-22 15:08:06	bfrk	create
2020-07-22 15:23:13	bfrk	set	status: needs-screening -> needs-review
2020-07-25 21:05:25	ganesh	set	status: needs-review -> accepted-pending-tests messages: + msg22252
2020-07-25 22:13:07	ganesh	set	status: accepted-pending-tests -> accepted