1 patch for repository http://darcs.net/screened:

patch 5b159a9fcfaf16aad7cea8cf56d95ffa54a41e51
Author: Ben Franksen <ben.franksen@online.de>
Date:   Sat Dec  3 15:46:23 CET 2022
  * optimize conflict resolution in tentativelyMergePatches_

  Examining patches for conflicts and then generating the markup is complex
  and scales poorly with the length of the sequence to be examined. So it
  makes sense to always choose the shorter of the two merged sequences to
  apply standardResolution on; the more so since in almost all cases occurring
  in practice the length of at least one of the two sequences is pretty short.
  However, this is only valid if the remote patches don't have unresolved
  conflicts in the first place. Detecting this condition requires another
  conflict resolution step, but one that is usually cheap because it can stop
  at the first clean tag.

  With this patch, pulling everything from a large repo (e.g. darcs screened)
  into an empty repository, while still not nearly as fast as a clone,
  completes in a reasonable time (and also doesn't run into darcs-2 commute
  bugs). This could be further improved by optimizing the process of updating
  the working tree which is a lot slower than updating pristine.

Attachments

• optimize-conflict-resolution-in-tentativelymergepatches_.dpatch
• patch-preview.txt

Looks fine. I haven't thought in detail about whether conflict
resolution is symmetric like this but it seems reasonable.

> +          null $ conflictedPaths $ patchsetConflictResolutions $

Using "conflictedPaths" as the indicator of "are there any conflicts"
seems standard in other places in the code, but it does feel a bit
ugly. It doesn't seem intrinsic that a conflict has to be associated
with some path, though it's no doubt true right now, at least if
we ignore the already-broken setpref patches.