Thanks for the test!
> +## Test for issueNNNN - <SYNOPSIS: WHAT IS THE BUG? THIS SYNOPSIS
> +## SHOULD BE ONE OR TWO SENTENCES.>
> +##
> +## Copyright (C) YEAR AUTHOR
You forgot to customise this; I'll be pushing a follow up patch tweaking
the title and assigning you the copyright, which I think is safe to
assume you do not object to.
Also a good chance for us in the Review Team to remember the "trivial
things should not block patch application" principle, which I think I
tend to forget in my nitpickiness :-) [of course, there's also a sort of
"raise the bar" principle where you start to expect certain things from
longtime contributors, but that's a different story!]
> +echo 'Example content 1.' > f
> +darcs record -lam 'Add file f'
> +echo 'Example content 2.' > g
> +darcs record -lam 'Add file g'
> +darcs put ../S # S as a copy of R
> +echo "y" | darcs amend-record --index=2 -m 'A new file f' # Since --index is ignored this command works in
> + # interactive mode, and the amended patch is the one
> + # with index 1.
I tried to improve this by using amend-record --all but Petr
pointed out that this applies to the primitive patches only
(we call them "changes" for end users).
Curious, I did a little test on darcs rollback to see how it
handles --all (since it's another command that interactively
steps through both named and primitive patches), and in that
context, all applies to both.
--
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
For a faster response, try +44 (0)1273 64 2905 or
xmpp:kowey@jabber.fr (Jabber or Google Talk only)
|
