2 patches for repository http://darcs.net:

Tue Nov 30 00:28:14 MSK 2010  Dmitry Tsygankov <dmitry.tsygankov@gmail.com>
  * darcsdir ++ "/pristine.hashed" -> hashedPristineDirectory

Tue Nov 30 01:46:07 MSK 2010  Dmitry Tsygankov <dmitry.tsygankov@gmail.com>
  * "_darcs" -> darcsdir

Attachments

• darcsdir-__-__pristine_hashed_-__-hashedpristinedirectory.dpatch
• unnamed

darcsdir ++ "/pristine.hashed" -> hashedPristineDirectory
---------------------------------------------------------
Dmitry Tsygankov <dmitry.tsygankov@gmail.com>**20101129212814

ok

"_darcs" -> darcsdir
--------------------
Dmitry Tsygankov <dmitry.tsygankov@gmail.com>**20101129224607

ok, though it's a bit alarming to have darcsdir ++ "/blah" vs darcsdir
</> "blah" all over. On the other hand, this patch is not making it
any worse.

This now conflicts with screened.

Sorry for the holdup in reviewing your cleanup work, Dmitry.  Let us know 
if there's anything we can do to help you resubmit (this time against 
http://darcs.net/screened if it that's OK).  Thanks!

> it's a bit alarming to have darcsdir ++ "/blah" vs darcsdir </> "blah"
all over

Exactly, that's what I thought. The only reason why I didn't fix this
immediately was that, in fact, there are three possible separator
choices here: "/", System.FilePath.(</>) and 
System.FilePath.Posix.(</>), and I'm not sure if System.FilePath.(</>)
would break Darcs on Windows, by creating URLs like
"http://www.darcs.net\_darcs\". Some kind of 'official' coding
convention would be useful.

> Let us know if there's anything we can do to help you resubmit

Thanks, I'm fine with that, though it would have to wait until February.
There's surely no need to waste your precious time resolving these
conflicts.

I think we should just drop this patch (sorry, Dmitry)

It's worth doing, but a bit tedious.  Somebody else (hopefully Dmitry) in 
the future will hopefully get sick enough of the strings to fix it again.