Patch 706: Add Haddock header to Darcs.Annotate (and 1 more) - Darcs bug tracker

Title	Add Haddock header to Darcs.Annotate (and 1 more)
Superseder		Nosy List	mndrix, wlangstroth
Related Issues
Status	accepted	Assigned To
Milestone

Created on 2012-01-28.13:32:20 by wlangstroth, last changed 2012-03-24.16:30:25 by gh.

Files
File name	Status	Uploaded	Type	Edit	Remove
add-haddock-header-to-darcs_annotate.dpatch		wlangstroth, 2012-01-28.13:32:19	application/x-darcs-patch
patch-preview.txt		wlangstroth, 2012-01-28.13:32:19	text/x-darcs-patch
unnamed		wlangstroth, 2012-01-28.13:32:19

See mailing list archives for discussion on individual patches.

Messages
msg15064 (view)	Author: wlangstroth	Date: 2012-01-28.13:32:19
Applies some whitespace and formatting, following the proposed style guide. 2 patches for repository http://darcs.net: Wed Jan 25 22:08:55 EST 2012 Will Langstroth <will@langstroth.com> * Add Haddock header to Darcs.Annotate Sat Jan 28 08:26:15 EST 2012 Will Langstroth <will@langstroth.com> * Readability changes to Darcs.Annotate Attachments add-haddock-header-to-darcs_annotate.dpatch patch-preview.txt unnamed
msg15301 (view)	Author: mndrix	Date: 2012-03-13.03:16:34
> -updateFile :: ([B.ByteString] -> AnnotatedM [B.ByteString]) -> AnnotatedM () > +updateFile :: ([B.ByteString] > + -> AnnotatedM [B.ByteString]) > + -> AnnotatedM () I probably would have left the first argument's type signature on one line. Until I spotted the parentheses, I assumed updateFile took two arguments rather than a single function argument. The rest of the patches look good and the above is only minor, so can a committer please push this patch.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012-01-28 13:32:20	wlangstroth	create
2012-02-22 21:14:36	ganesh	set	status: needs-screening -> needs-review
2012-03-13 03:16:34	mndrix	set	status: needs-review -> accepted-pending-tests nosy: + mndrix messages: + msg15301
2012-03-24 16:30:25	gh	set	status: accepted-pending-tests -> accepted