darcs

Patch 735 Tidy up and Haddock Non. Rename some functions in Non ...

Title Tidy up and Haddock Non. Rename some functions in Non ...
Superseder Nosy List owst
Related Issues
Status accepted Assigned To
Milestone

Created on 2012-03-01.02:15:35 by owst, last changed 2012-03-24.16:07:36 by gh.

Files
File name Status Uploaded Type Edit Remove
patch-preview.txt owst, 2012-03-01.02:15:34 text/x-darcs-patch
tidy-up-and-haddock-non_-rename-some-functions-in-non-and-correspondingn-use_sites-in-real.dpatch owst, 2012-03-01.02:15:34 application/x-darcs-patch
unnamed owst, 2012-03-01.02:15:34
See mailing list archives for discussion on individual patches.
Messages
msg15196 (view) Author: owst Date: 2012-03-01.02:15:34
I've quite extensively shuffled/renamed/commented Non, hopefully it's a bit
easier to understand now...

1 patch for repository http://darcs.net:

Thu Mar  1 02:19:49 GMT 2012  Owen Stephens <darcs@owenstephens.co.uk>
  * Tidy up and Haddock Non. Rename some functions in Non and correspondingn use-sites in Real
Attachments
msg15390 (view) Author: mndrix Date: 2012-03-23.21:40:16
Thanks for documenting and cleaning that code.  I don't understand all the 
details, but the comments and new names certainly clarified the high level 
purpose.

Committers, please push the patch.

> hunk ./src/Darcs/Patch/V2/Non.hs
> +-- TODO: Figure out what remNons is for; it's is only used in one place 
- when

s/it's is/it's/

Whichever patch addresses the TODO can correct the typo at the same time.
msg15394 (view) Author: gh Date: 2012-03-24.16:07:36
Done.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-03-01 02:15:35owstcreate
2012-03-01 07:24:48ganeshsetstatus: needs-screening -> needs-review
2012-03-23 21:40:16mndrixsetstatus: needs-review -> accepted-pending-tests
messages: + msg15390
2012-03-24 16:07:36ghsetstatus: accepted-pending-tests -> accepted
messages: + msg15394