I'm taking the liberty of assigning Benedikt to this because he's
working on the new readable darcs annotate in issue25.
Whatever prefix darcs annotate uses to return the patch info hash, it
seems that our hash matcher should accept.
It seems the key point here is not the implementation, but deciding what
sort of prefix that should be (hence need-action)
Even if we don't have the new darcs annotate by Darcs 2.5 I would
suggest getting this done by then so that we're ready.
|