A patch in which the patch name contains a funny sequence of
characters, originally meant to be a 'ü', gets displayed colorized, which I 
think, should not be.

This is the relevant part of the outout:

aragon: .../PITZ-Controls/tailor > darcs 
changes --repo=tailor_d1 --xml-output --patches='rkmann' | grep name                
        <name>Versions 42 (Modulator) and 10 (Gun) as sent by K.B\fcrkmann 
to Jakob Rytter on 06-06-06</name>

and this is what it looks like byte by byte, look for 'esc':

aragon: .../PITZ-Controls/tailor > darcs 
changes --repo=tailor_d1 --xml-output --patches='rkmann' | grep name | 
od -t x1 -t a
0000000 09 3c 6e 61 6d 65 3e 56 65 72 73 69 6f 6e 73 20
         ht   <   n   a   m   e   >   V   e   r   s   i   o   n   s  sp
0000020 34 32 20 28 4d 6f 64 75 6c 61 74 6f 72 29 20 61
          4   2  sp   (   M   o   d   u   l   a   t   o   r   )  sp   a
0000040 6e 64 20 31 30 20 28 47 75 6e 29 20 61 73 20 73
          n   d  sp   1   0  sp   (   G   u   n   )  sp   a   s  sp   s
0000060 65 6e 74 20 62 79 20 4b 2e 42 1b 5b 30 31 3b 33
          e   n   t  sp   b   y  sp   K   .   B esc   [   0   1   ;   3
0000100 31 6d 5c 66 63 1b 5b 30 30 6d 72 6b 6d 61 6e 6e
          1   m   \   f   c esc   [   0   0   m   r   k   m   a   n   n
0000120 20 74 6f 20 4a 61 6b 6f 62 20 52 79 74 74 65 72
         sp   t   o  sp   J   a   k   o   b  sp   R   y   t   t   e   r
0000140 20 6f 6e 20 30 36 2d 30 36 2d 30 36 3c 2f 6e 61
         sp   o   n  sp   0   6   -   0   6   -   0   6   <   /   n   a
0000160 6d 65 3e 0a
          m   e   >  nl
0000164

This happens with both darcs-1.09 and darcs-2.00.

A stop-gap work-around is to

  export DARCS_DONT_COLOR=1

Ben

This one is really a needs-volunteer.

See http://wiki.darcs.net/index.html/DarcsInternals particularly, the
ColourPrinter link.

Lele, I am inviting you to work on this one if you are interested.  It may be a
good way to familiarise yourself with yet another component of darcs, now that
you've got an idea what's going on with the XML stuff.  Would you be willing to
have a look?

Oh, there is a perhaps a deeper issue about why darcs is trying to print umlauts
as \fc and what not.  

But I think that gets us into http://bugs.darcs.net/issue64 and
http://bugs.darcs.net/issue33 which is a whole other discussion :-)

The '\fc' for the 'ü' is not darcs' fault, it is simply the iso88591 encoding. 
We switched to utf8 some time after this patch was recorded.

Well the backslash-hexcode thing ('\fc') is definitely darcs-specific (see
<http://darcs.net/manual/node5.html#env:DARCS_DONT_ESCAPE_nonascii>), although
maybe you meant something else.

That said, wouldn't the UTF-8 encoded version of the same character involve two
backslash-hexcode sequences in darcs?

Resolved by

Fri Jun 13 12:09:22 BST 2008  benjamin.franksen@bessy.de
  * fix issue #918: use simplePrinters for xml output in "darcs changes" command