[patch] looks ...
Eric Kow <kowey@darcs.net> writes:
> Could you let us know if this fixes it?
Yup; running "cabal haddock" in an up-to-date copy of the darcs repo for
darcs with that patch applied succeeds. It spits out a lot of errors,
but it still succeeds! \o/
--
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
Ivan.Miljenovic@gmail.com
IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com
Hmm, not an actual patch but a slight patch tracker mishap. I think the patch
tracker knows how to recognise [patchXXX] in the subject line to respond to an
existing patch or otherwise create a new patch. Not sure what happened here :-)