> I can't see any obvious issue with the strategy, though I haven't
> tested it myself. I think you should go ahead (and one of us should
> do a release to hackage) and if it doesn't work out we can always
> release a new version.
There is not much point in making a release and uploading that to
hackage. Because if you install darcs using cabal like any other
dependency, then there is no problem with Setup.hs. Indeed I have tried
to build my updated darcsden fork against darcs-2.14.2 in the default
way (i.e. without having a local copy of the darcs sources inside the
darcsden tree) and that works just fine.
But this also means that my patch doesn't make much sense for the
branch-2.14. There is no need to compile against a clone of branch-2.14
if the released darcs-2.14.2 that cabal finds and uses by default works
perfectly well as a dependency.
I'll mark this patch as rejected.
Attachments
|