We may still want to be stricter in what we accept when parsing a patch
bundle but that should be a separate issue.

1 patch for repository http://darcs.net/screened:

patch 3a1500fc006cb7d96fd5927091650e05356f8e49
Author: Ben Franksen <ben.franksen@online.de>
Date:   Sat Aug  1 15:46:45 CEST 2020
  * add (succeeding) test for issue2549

Attachments

• add-_succeeding_-test-for-issue2549.dpatch
• patch-preview.txt
• unnamed

FYI the tests pass on Windows with this patch

If I understand correctly the rationale for the test is that darcs might
historically have written out patches with the trailing / so we want to
keep accepting them?

> If I understand correctly the rationale for the test is that darcs might
> historically have written out patches with the trailing / so we want to
> keep accepting them?

No. The test only demonstrates that the inconsistent behavior observed
in the bug report no longer exists. As I mentioned right at the top when
I posted the patch, my opinion is that we should *not* accept such a
bundle. But this is a separate issue.