1 patch for repository http://darcs.net:

Thu May 13 14:29:56 CEST 2010  Guillaume Hoffmann <guillaume.hoffmann@loria.fr>
  * accept issue1845

Attachments

• accept-issue1845.dpatch
• unnamed

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 12:36:43 +0000, Guillaume Hoffmann wrote:
> Thu May 13 14:29:56 CEST 2010  Guillaume Hoffmann <guillaume.hoffmann@loria.fr>
>   * accept issue1845

I promise I'm not just trying to make you jump through hoops here, 
but you could append a very brief description to that patch name?

The aim is to make sure darcs changes output is understandable
over the long term.

> +. lib                           # Load some portability helpers.
> +rm -rf R S                      # Another script may have left a mess.
> +darcs init      --repo R        # Create our test repos.
> +cd R
> +mkdir subdir
> +touch subdir/subfile
> +darcs add subdir subdir/subfile
> +darcs record -am"add subdir and subfile"
> +cd subdir
> +rm subfile
> +darcs record subfile -am"delete file in subdirectory" # fails because darcs wants subdir/subfile 

I *think* I've experienced something similar before, but wasn't sure if
I was imagining things.  So thanks very much for the bug report and now
test!

-- 
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9

1 patch for repository http://darcs.net:

Thu May 13 15:08:03 CEST 2010  Guillaume Hoffmann <guillaume.hoffmann@loria.fr>
  * accept issue1845 darcs wants file paths from root of working copy

Attachments

• accept-issue1845-darcs-wants-file-paths-from-root-of-working-copy.dpatch
• unnamed

Sorry for the noise.  This was accepted, but I decided to tweak roundup
a bit more so that darcswatch mails went to darcs-devel (instead of just
to the nosy list).  But then I broke the tracker.  Should be fixed now.

This patch bundle (with 1 patches) was just applied to the repository http://darcs.net/reviewed.
This message was brought to you by DarcsWatch
http://darcswatch.nomeata.de/repo_http:__darcs.net_reviewed.html#bundle-28da32173cafbb75be4d66639cd61e2d23b82da2