darcs

Patch 30 Recast patch property comments in Unicode.

Bug Tracker Home

Issues
Show Unassigned
 Show All
Search Issues

Patches
Show Open
 Show All
Search Patches

Login




Register
Lost your login?

Help
Roundup docs

Title Recast patch property comments in Unicode.
Superseder Nosy List kowey, twb
Related Issues
Status accepted Assigned To
Milestone

Created on 2009-10-31.12:51:53 by twb, last changed 2012-01-06.06:59:13 by ganesh.

Files
File name Status Uploaded Type Edit Remove
draft_-haddockize-literate-comments-in-darcs_patch_properties_.dpatch dead twb, 2009-10-31.12:51:52 text/x-darcs-patch
patch-preview.txt kowey, 2011-12-31.23:30:01 text/x-darcs-patch
recast-patch-property-comments-in-unicode_.dpatch kowey, 2011-12-31.23:30:01 application/x-darcs-patch
unnamed twb, 2009-10-31.12:51:52 text/plain
unnamed kowey, 2011-12-31.23:30:01
See mailing list archives for discussion on individual patches.
Messages
msg9114 (view) Author: twb Date: 2009-10-31.12:51:52 
This is a sexy patch, but it won't work until Haddock gets the hang of
Unicode.

Sun Sep 20 17:01:02 EST 2009  Trent W. Buck <trentbuck@gmail.com>
  * DRAFT: Haddockize literate comments in Darcs.Patch.Properties.
Attachments
msg9136 (view) Author: kowey Date: 2009-10-31.19:18:26 
Hi Trent, how about a non-sexy version sans Unicode?  Just a general attitude of
keep it simple, get it out the the door if possible.  I haven't really looked in
detail yet, but I think this would avoid having the patch linger.
msg9154 (view) Author: twb Date: 2009-11-01.02:35:15 
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 07:18:26PM +0000, Eric Kow wrote:
> Hi Trent, how about a non-sexy version sans Unicode?  Just a general
> attitude of keep it simple, get it out the the door if possible.  I
> haven't really looked in detail yet, but I think this would avoid
> having the patch linger.

I could kludge that together; I was worried about losing important
information (e.g. does "==" mean equivalence, or mere equality?)

I suppose Haddock might support HTMLisms like &equiv; and &rArr;,
which ought to be enough for most of the symbols used in the text.  I
don't think Haddock targets anything but HTML at present :-/
msg14930 (view) Author: kowey Date: 2011-12-31.23:30:01 
1 patch for repository http://darcs.net:

Look! A two-digit patch ticket.
Does this improve readability?

There were some other bits of documentation taken from the LaTeX,
but I think the generic module-level stuff may not be needed, and
the identity patch stuff may have gone away (?)

Sat Dec 31 23:27:09 GMT 2011  Eric Kow <kowey@darcs.net>
  * Recast patch property comments in Unicode.
  
  Originally from a draft patch by Trent Buck
    "DRAFT: Haddockize literate comments in Darcs.Patch.Properties."
  Haddock does not support Unicode characters unless they are escaped;
  however, the patch properties file in question has since moved to the
  test suite which is unlikely to be haddocked.
Attachments
msg14961 (view) Author: kowey Date: 2012-01-05.22:45:33 
No point making people review this
History
Date User Action Args
2009-10-31 12:51:53twbcreate
2009-10-31 19:18:26koweysetstatus: needs-review -> followup-requested
assignedto: twb
messages: + msg9136
nosy: + kowey
2009-11-01 02:35:16twbsetmessages: + msg9154
2011-12-31 23:30:01koweysetfiles: + patch-preview.txt, recast-patch-property-comments-in-unicode_.dpatch, unnamed
messages: + msg14930
2011-12-31 23:30:50koweysetstatus: followup-requested -> needs-screening
2011-12-31 23:31:02koweysetassignedto: twb ->
2012-01-01 18:26:36koweysettitle: DRAFT: Haddockize literate comments in Darcs.Patch.Pro... -> Recast patch property comments in Unicode.
2012-01-05 22:45:33koweysetstatus: needs-screening -> accepted-pending-tests
messages: + msg14961
2012-01-06 06:59:13ganeshsetstatus: accepted-pending-tests -> accepted