Patch 884 resolve issue2211 - darcs would complain if recording ...

Title resolve issue2211 - darcs would complain if recording ...
Superseder Nosy List owst
Related Issues
Status obsoleted Assigned To

Created on 2012-07-18.18:12:24 by owst, last changed 2016-03-18.21:00:26 by gh.

File name Status Uploaded Type Edit Remove
patch-preview.txt owst, 2012-07-18.18:12:24 text/x-darcs-patch
resolve-issue2211-_-darcs-would-complain-if-recording-on-a-added_but_unrecorded-file.dpatch owst, 2012-07-18.18:12:24 application/x-darcs-patch
unnamed owst, 2012-07-18.18:12:24
See mailing list archives for discussion on individual patches.
msg15883 (view) Author: owst Date: 2012-07-18.18:12:24
1 patch for repository http://darcs.net:

Wed Jul 18 19:12:02 BST 2012  Owen Stephens <darcs@owenstephens.co.uk>
  * resolve issue2211 - darcs would complain if recording on a added-but-unrecorded file
msg15884 (view) Author: owst Date: 2012-07-18.18:13:16
I'd forgotten the copyright header on the test
msg15885 (view) Author: owst Date: 2012-07-18.20:15:38
This patch isn't quite there, it breaks the test for issue2066. I'll see
what I can work out - it appears that shell-rm'd files don't appear in
readRecordedAndPending's output...
msg15887 (view) Author: owst Date: 2012-07-18.20:52:46
This patch will be fine, when issue2212 has been fixed. Currently, darcs
will update pending with rm'd files, when adding distinct files. This
causes the issue2066 test to fail, since darcs thinks that one of the
files has been deleted in pending.
msg19106 (view) Author: gh Date: 2016-03-18.21:00:26
I'm retiring this bundle in the light of Ben's recent patches on
record's arguments handling http://bugs.darcs.net/patch1468 .
Date User Action Args
2012-07-18 18:12:24owstcreate
2012-07-18 18:12:27owstlinkpatch883 superseder
2012-07-18 18:13:16owstsetmessages: + msg15884
2012-07-18 20:15:38owstsetstatus: needs-screening -> review-in-progress
messages: + msg15885
2012-07-18 20:52:46owstsetmessages: + msg15887
2016-03-18 21:00:26ghsetstatus: review-in-progress -> obsoleted
messages: + msg19106