|
Created on 2010-05-22.17:31:35 by kowey, last changed 2010-06-15.22:40:12 by galbolle.
msg11099 (view) |
Author: kowey |
Date: 2010-05-22.17:31:34 |
|
I was using -p if it changes anything.
I think this may be a regression
--
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
|
msg11100 (view) |
Author: kowey |
Date: 2010-05-22.17:35:26 |
|
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 17:31:35 +0000, Eric Kow wrote:
> I was using -p if it changes anything.
> I think this may be a regression
I can confirm that darcs-2.4.4 handles this case fine
(and that you have to use a matcher to trigger this)
This is why it's a good idea for the Darcs Team to be using Darcs HEAD
if possible... bugs take a long time to discover :-)
--
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
|
msg11151 (view) |
Author: kowey |
Date: 2010-05-29.13:52:38 |
|
Assigning to myself to create a test case (is that even a good idea here?).
Making Florent nosy because there's a chance this is related to the
recent refactor.
|
msg11202 (view) |
Author: kowey |
Date: 2010-06-02.20:05:30 |
|
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 13:52:41 +0000, Eric Kow wrote:
> Assigning to myself to create a test case (is that even a good idea here?).
Done. (and confirmed that it passes on darcs-2.4.3)
> Making Florent nosy because there's a chance this is related to the
> recent refactor.
Florent: could you have a look?
--
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
|
msg11203 (view) |
Author: kowey |
Date: 2010-06-02.20:10:29 |
|
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 20:05:30 +0000, Eric Kow wrote:
> Done. (and confirmed that it passes on darcs-2.4.3)
Sigh, why write one mail when you can write two?
I meant to say that I pushed this directly to the repo
(as we've loosened the commit policy so that tests get fast-tracked that
way)
--
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
|
msg11216 (view) |
Author: galbolle |
Date: 2010-06-03.16:54:51 |
|
The following patch updated the status of issue1848 to be resolved:
* resolve issue1848: Patch.Choices.makeEverythingSooner is incorrect
Ignore-this: ef9ea4cb04d313c668b3854409e5f451
This made selection of patches with --match buggy when choosing Last or
FirstReversed patches. This affected primary patch selection in rollback,
record --ask, and any other command with --reverse.
|
msg11448 (view) |
Author: galbolle |
Date: 2010-06-15.22:40:11 |
|
The following patch updated issue issue1848 with status=resolved;resolvedin=2.5.0 (current)
* resolve issue1848: Patch.Choices.makeEverythingSooner is incorrect
Ignore-this: ef9ea4cb04d313c668b3854409e5f451
This made selection of patches with --match buggy when choosing Last or
FirstReversed patches. This affected primary patch selection in rollback,
record --ask, and any other command with --reverse.
|
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-05-22 17:31:35 | kowey | create | |
2010-05-22 17:35:27 | kowey | set | messages:
+ msg11100 |
2010-05-29 13:52:41 | kowey | set | status: unknown -> needs-reproduction priority: bug nosy:
+ galbolle, jaredj messages:
+ msg11151 topic:
+ ProbablyEasy, UI, Regression, Target-2.5 assignedto: kowey |
2010-06-02 20:05:30 | kowey | set | messages:
+ msg11202 |
2010-06-02 20:10:30 | kowey | set | messages:
+ msg11203 |
2010-06-03 16:54:51 | galbolle | set | status: needs-reproduction -> resolved messages:
+ msg11216 |
2010-06-15 20:52:16 | admin | set | milestone: 2.5.0 |
2010-06-15 21:00:08 | admin | set | topic:
- Target-2.5 |
2010-06-15 22:40:12 | galbolle | set | messages:
+ msg11448 resolvedin: 2.5.0 |
|