darcs

Issue 2347 amend-record and amend-unrecord ignore --prompt-long-comment

Title amend-record and amend-unrecord ignore --prompt-long-comment
Priority Status resolved
Milestone Resolved in 2.10.0 HEAD
Superseder Nosy List bf
Assigned To
Topics

Created on 2013-10-26.23:38:12 by bf, last changed 2013-11-20.20:39:14 by noreply.

Messages
msg17076 (view) Author: bf Date: 2013-10-26.23:38:10
1. Summarise the issue (what were doing, what went wrong?)

ben@sarun[1]: .../tmp/test > darcs amend-record --prompt-long-comment
Mon Oct 21 20:41:56 CEST 2013  benjamin.franksen@helmholtz-berlin.de
  * renamed EV_ID to EF_ID, added seq_efInit for internal use
Shall I amend this patch? [yNjk...], or ? for more options: y
Finished amending patch:
Sun Oct 27 01:31:11 CEST 2013  benjamin.franksen@helmholtz-berlin.de
  * renamed EV_ID to EF_ID, added seq_efInit for internal use

2. What behaviour were you expecting instead?

A prompt asking me whether I want to edit the long comment. The above
example had no changes in the repo but I verified that making some
changes did not change the behaviour.

Amend-unrecord behaves the same.

The --prompt-long-comment option *does* work with 'darcs record'. The
option is also listed as a valid option for both amend-record and
amend-unrecord.

3. What darcs version are you using? (Try: darcs --exact-version)

ben@sarun[1]: .../tmp/test > darcs --version
2.9.7 (+ 145 patches)
msg17086 (view) Author: noreply Date: 2013-11-20.20:39:13
The following patch sent by Guillaume Hoffmann <guillaumh@gmail.com> updated issue issue2347 with
status=resolved;resolvedin=2.10.0 HEAD

* resolve issue2347: fix amend-record --prompt-long-comment 
Ignore-this: 760686129d2d5ff97ac935e8cd39f5a
History
Date User Action Args
2013-10-26 23:38:12bfcreate
2013-11-20 20:39:14noreplysetstatus: unknown -> resolved
messages: + msg17086
resolvedin: 2.10.0 HEAD