We should change it so when there's only one change to be reverted, it says
"Do you wish to revert this change?".  It'll make users more confident in
saying yes.
-- 
David Roundy
Department of Physics
Oregon State University

2007-11-01T15:59:33 David Roundy:
> We should change it so when there's only one change to be
> reverted, it says "Do you wish to revert this change?". It'll make
> users more confident in saying yes.

Could we maybe say "do you want to revert this changeset", and leave
the plurality or otherwise for folks who care about what's in the
details of the changeset?

Any time I see a change request that lies in the irregular parts of
the english language as it's spoken by at least some allegedly
endlish-speakers at this point in history, my skin crawls.

-Bennett

Where is this place where this occurs? Just running "darcs revert" with 1.0.9
looks like this:

$ darcs revert
hunk ./1.t 1
+b
Shall I revert this change? (1/?)  [ynWsfqadjkc], or ? for help:

###
...it is already singular.

It's in the next query after you hit 'y' and then 'd' (indicating you only want
one change reverted).

darcs says:

Do you really want to revert these changes?

even though only one change was selected.

I think my patch fixes this:
Tue Jan 29 16:36:33 GMT 2008  Eric Kow <E.Y.Kow@brighton.ac.uk>
  * [issue558] Singular 'do you want to revert this change?'