Is it intentional that "n" in darcs changes -i doesn't do the same  
thing that "n" does in, for example, darcs pull, but instead is  
redundant with "q"?

Regards,

Zooko

The following patch updated the status of issue795 to be resolved in the unstable branch:

* resolve issue795: Make 'darcs changes -i' behave more like other jobs. 

Old behaviour:
 Shall I continue to view changes?
   y - do not view this patch; keep going [DEFAULT]
   n - quit
   v - view this patch; keep going
   q - quit

New behaviour:
  Shall I view this patch?
   y - view this patch; keep going
   n - do not view this patch; keep going [DEFAULT]
   v - view this patch; keep going
   q - quit

You can view the patch details online here: 
http://darcs.net/cgi-bin/darcs.cgi/unstable/?c=annotate&p=20080421105247-2067a-d35576ce17fd8fbe6a23066f7d47405b72c66500.gz